Skip to main content

Peter Hoekstra ad features 'DebbieSpendItNOW'
Yeah, the Pete Hoekstra campaign
would never pander to racists. Silly us.
It's only the beginning of summer, so I can't imagine how nutty the "birther" conspiracy theorists are going to get by the time the actual election rolls around. Already, the Republican Party as a whole seems dedicated to the notion that there just is no conspiracy theory too ridiculous to be coddled—and why would they think otherwise, when their base has gone nuts? It's not like they have a choice.

So here's senate candidate Pete Hoekstra, simultaneously walking back and doubling down on his previous suggestion that something really ought to be done about this whole maybe the president is illegitimate after all thing. In political speak, we call that difficult-to-execute twofer Pulling a Romney:

"You would think that a country as great as ours could have a single person, maybe two, who every two years was assigned with the responsibility of making sure that people who run for office meet the minimum qualifications for that office so that we will never have this discussion again," Hoekstra said Wednesday during a candidate forum at the Mackinac Policy Conference.
I think we already have something better than that, though, in the vast national press corps (note: this is perhaps the only time I will praise the national press, and I am about to immediately disembowel that praise). Scandal is something they are quite good at! We have a lovely free-market solution to the problem of unauthorized candidate-being, which is that all across America, there are journalists who would sell their own mothers to get confirmation of a story like "a presidential nominee is secretly not an American after all!" And, as we can see, having scores of vetting reporters confirming that the current president's paperwork does, indeed, check out has done almost nothing to quell the suspicions of those people who really, really want to believe otherwise. Do we really think that having one or two government functionaries saying the same thing would "settle" a damn thing?

That's the doubling down part. But Hoekstra wants you to know, simultaneously, that he's very cranky at even having to talk about this:

The West Michigan Republican grew animated and loud as he defended remarks he made earlier this month at a Michigan tea party gathering, suggesting he would not have broached the topic if he had not been asked.

"This is an absolutely ludicrous discussion to be having four years after a presidential (election)," Hoekstra said at a near  shout. "It is an absolute waste of time and energy. We have trillion dollar deficits. We have eight percent unemployment. We have a health care system that is collapsing. And somebody is asking about the birthing issue?"

Don't look now, but I think he just called the tea party a bunch of dipshits.

Still, he points out the wonderful thing about birtherism: Of course it's a waste of time and energy, if you think about it logically. If the point is merely to pander to thinly veiled racist sentiments of Obama's otherness, however, thus satisfying a large percentage of the base who are convinced of Obama's supposed "radical" nature because of that supposed otherness, then it becomes a nice little campaign tool.

Despite Hoekstra's protestations, that's in fact exactly how he used it. In front of a tea party crowd of conspiracy theorists, he entertained their theory and suggested government ought to get right on that. In front of a slightly less embarrassing crowd, he denounced the same damn thing as a waste of time—while still suggesting government get right on that. That's the way the birther game is played.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site